From owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Wed Feb 24 08:55:34 1999
Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA24923
	for pups-liszt; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:52:24 +1100 (EST)
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.edu.au [131.236.21.158])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA24917
	for <pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:52:16 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost)
	by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA04722
	for pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:52:15 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from wkt)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199902232152.IAA04722@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Subject: Re: SCO Source license tainting?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05-df.9902231646390.8684-100000@bartlet.df.lth.se> from Jesper Nilsson at "Feb 23, 1999  5: 0:54 pm"
To: pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (Unix Heritage Society)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:52:15 +1100 (EST)
Reply-To: wkt@cs.adfa.edu.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups@minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

In article by Jesper Nilsson:
> I'm thinking about getting myself a SCO Source license,
> but I'm worried that I might get "tainted" by this
> since my day job involves writing operating systems...
> My employer would not appreciate getting sued because of
> my hobbies...:-)

As long as you don't reuse tainted Unix source code in your job, you will
be ok. There are so many books covering the Unix kernel: Lions, Bach,
Goodheart, Vahalia etc., that any concerns other than source code reuse
are negligible.

That's my feelings, anyway.

	Warren

