Complex Thoughts
What is the complex in my 8590/95 or 9590/9595? Look HERE
Type 0
Type 1 (G-K) Type
2 (H-L) Type 3 (M)
Type 4 (N-Y)
Useless Trivia
16 Bit Busmasters
Will
a -xxx Complex work in my 90 / 95?
Replacing CPUs on a Complex
Check the Pin 1 orientation before powering up! I
a good 486DX4-75 ODPR (smoke! Popping noises!) after not checking
my pin 1 placement!
OK, crankheads, here's a unscientific comparison
of some complex performances. Some unusual results...
Processor Complex
In the first PS/2* models, most components were integrated
into the planar of the system. This severely limited upgrade options and
upgrade flexibility. While one component was upgraded, for example the
processor, the other components such as the I/O controller and the memory
controller were not. This created combinations of fast and slow components,
which created unbalanced systems. Unbalanced systems are not as efficient
as balanced systems where every components¢ performance is matched
against other components¢ performances.
With this in mind, the server key components have been
grouped together on a separate card known as a processor complex. Now the
processor is contained on a removable processor complex board, which also
holds the processor/memory bus, the memory controller, DMA controller,
and Micro Channel* bus interface. Placing the processor on a complex together
with key components means that when a system is upgraded, balanced systems
performance can be maintained.
IBM has provided an upgrade path for existing and future
file servers that allows network design engineers to replace the system
processor complex with a faster and more efficient system processor complex
at a later date. This policy of upgrading allows the server to accommodate
increased server CPU utilization without the need to buy a complete new
machine.
Within the processor complex there are many features that are capable
of providing more efficient data transfer. They consist of:
· Cache
· Dual Path to Memory
· Two-Way Interleaved Memory Banks
· 32-bit DMA Controller
· 40MBps Data Streaming
Processor Cache
Processor cache is a memory that can be accessed 5 to
10 times faster than standard memory. Cache memory uses Static Random Access
Memory (SRAM) which is much faster than the Dynamic Random Access Memory
(DRAM) used for system memory. SRAM is more expensive and requires more
power, which is why it is not used for all memory.
There are two levels of cache. The cache incorporated
into the main system processor is known as Level 1 (L1) cache. The 486
incorporates a single 8KB cache (Overdrive chips can have 16KB). Pentium**
features two 8KB caches, one for instructions and one for data. These caches
act as temporary storage places for instructions and data obtained from
slower, main memory. When a system uses data, it will be likely to use
it again, and getting it from an on-chip cache is much faster than getting
it from main memory.
The second level of cache, called second-level cache or
Level 2 cache, provides additional high speed memory to the Level 1 cache.
This additional cache memory works together with the cache memory native
to the main processor (L1). If the processor cannot find what it needs
in the processor cache (a first-level cache miss), it then looks in the
additional cache memory. If it finds the code or data there (a second-level
cache hit), the processor will use it, and continue. If the data is in
neither of the caches, an access to planar memory must occur. (G, H, and
L complexes do NOT have L2 cache, nor do they have a cache socket).
Within Level 2 cache there also two possible types of caching:
1. Write-Through Cache
Read operations are issued from the cache but write operations are
sent directly to the standard memory. Performance improvements are obtained
only for read operations.
2. Write-Back Cache
Write operations are also done to the cache. Transfer to standard memory
is done if:
· Memory is needed in the cache for another operation
· Modified data in the cache is needed for another application
It is believed that OS/2 uses much wider memory area than DOS or Microsoft
Windows**, so write-back cache is sometimes worse than write-through cache
mode.
Ed. I thought that all complexes
are set to write-through...
Dual Path to Memory
When bus masters were implemented on Micro Channel servers,
it was found that there was often contention for memory access between
the processor and the bus masters, and that the processor was being delayed
waiting for bus masters to release the path into memory. The new design
of the processor complexes addresses these issues by providing a dual-path
into memory, effectively providing two paths to system memory, one from
the processor and one from the Micro Channel.
These two separate paths to system memory allow overlapping of processor
and bus master cycles. (M-Y complexes)
Three kinds of overlapped cycles can occur:
· Processor reads to Level 2 cache simultaneously with bus master
I/O
· Processor reads to Level 2 cache simultaneously with bus master
memory access
· Processor reads to memory simultaneously with bus master I/O
In addition, both processor and Micro Channel cycles are
buffered into 16 bytes blocks, further alleviating the contention for memory
by reducing the frequency of the accesses. Implementing dual-path access
to memory and the buffering of cycles can give a system throughput of up
to three times that of a server without it.
Two-Way Interleaved Memory Banks
Another performance advantage is gained when the processor
is accessing memory in burst mode. Memory is split into two banks, and
data or code is stored sequentially across these banks; for example addresses
0 and 2 are held in bank 1, and addresses 1 and 3 are held in bank 2. The
reason for this arrangement is that when a 486 burst mode request is made,
the accesses to memory will be sequential. When the memory controller detects
such a burst request from, for example, bank 0, it also pre-fetches the
next 32 bits of data from bank 1. This way, the processor is not kept waiting
while the information is being retrieved from memory.
32-bit DMA Controller
A Direct Memory Access (DMA) controller is a dedicated unit with the
ability to move data between system memory and a device on the Micro Channel.
It is used by simple adapters, and also by the parallel and serial ports.
Earlier versions of the PS/2 Model 95 (G-L complexes)
implemented a 24-bit DMA, limiting DMA memory transfers to below 16MB (whereas
the 486 processor was able to address up to 4GB of memory). On 32-bit systems
with more than 16MB of memory, this could cause problems if a DMA access
was for memory above 16MB. The operating system could work around the problem
by ensuring that DMA buffers were always below 16MB when a DMA transfer
was done, but this imposes a performance penalty.
40MBps Data Streaming
The 40MBps data streaming transfer (M through
Y complexes) offers considerably improved I/O performance. As in
many cases, blocks transferred to and from memory are stored in sequential
addresses, so repeatedly sending the address for each four bytes is unnecessary.
With data streaming transfer the initial address is sent, then the blocks
of data are sent and it is then assumed that the data requests are sequential.
16 Bit Busmasters
The 9595 used with 16-bit busmasters (for
example, the PS/2 Micro Channel SCSI Adapter (#1005, 6451109)) that support
32-bits of addressing will cause system malfunction or potential loss of
data when the user installs greater than 16MB of system memory.
Complexes
work in all 8590 / 8595 / 9590 / 9595 / 500
Any existing Model 90, Model 95, or PC Server 500 can be upgraded to
a new Processor Complex. For example, Base 1 to Base 2 or Base 3 or Base
4; Base 2 to Base 4, etc.
NOTE: The power supply in the Model
90 case is supposedly a little small for the DX50, P60, P66, and P90 complexes.
And in addition, the air baffle in the Model 90 may have to be removed
if a processor with a big heat sink or heatsink / fan combination is installed.
BUT I have to wonder- it's rated for 215 Watts, it isn't THAT small..Hell,
the 9577 PS is only 194 Watts.
95A Planar Lacks Backward Compatability
The 95A (dual serial/dual parallel) planar will NOT support
other than a Type 4 complex. End of story. You will get a 174 error and
nothing more.
More Useless Trivia
Hi Louis !
>Peter, what are the differences in the G, J, K, and M class
boards?
Obviously not only the speed ...
As far as I can see IBM followed different "evolutionary
stages" with these boards. The first being presented was the 33MHz Type
1 (64F0198), which was offered as 64F0201 with only 25MHz almost at the
same time. The 33MHz model had been the "top line" model with cache and
all that. I got a "handwired" platform from Charles Lassiter, which has
still 64F0198 printed on the *card* but a 25.00Mhz oscillator and "handstamped"
ASICs. Looks a lot like a pre-production sample - and prooves that the
25MHz is derived from the 33MHz - not other way round. The earliest HRM
for the 95 however (dated March 1990 IIRC) mentiones both of them.
Mentions "optional 256K cache" - which makes clear that
no other board than 64F0198 and 64F0210 is meant. The 486DX2-33/66 board
92F0145 is then a much later developement out of the Non-SOD 64F0198 -
intended to use Flash-BIOS, but not fully developed or supported. (That's
the board with the odd bank-select jumper in the top/right corner)
(Ed. edit based on
personal inspection of a 92F0048) The 92F0048 appears to be also
based on the Non-SOD 64F0198, with a DX50 cpu, a 50MHz oscillator, and
some decoding circuitry mounted in the area that on the SOD would go on.
The matching 12nS cache module is 92F0050.
The smaller type-1 platforms had been offered to form
"entry models" - focussed on the Mod. 90 (92F0065 - 486SX-20 and 92F0049
- 486DX-20). The 92F0065, which I call "Kiddies CPUs", is the only one
which has a 487SX-presence" Jumper.
A totally different thread are the Type-2 platforms, which
all base on the 92F0079. The type-2 platforms have been developed to make
memory selection a bit easier - for the cost of some performance as a cost-efficient
solution.
The type-3 platform of the -M- class has been intended
for high-end servers: paired memory *and* ECC support. Only few Mod. 90
saw this platform as far as I know. Don't know if IBM ever offered it officially
in the 90. I remember having seen 2 or 3 Mod. 9590-AMF at a customer
- but they had the [PA]-sticker close to the Serial-number decal ... which
identifies them as "upgraded machines".
The -M- platform even survived the change from the 8595
to the 9595 (with the old planar and LED-planel however) along with the
92F0161 486DX2-25/50 -L- platform. Strange enough.
The final stage of the 486-line was reached with the Type-4
-N- class board 61G2343 - which was the precessor to the 5V-Pentium (P5)
platform. This however is a totally new developement, at a time when 486
processors were already a bit dusted.
The Type-4 platforms are all very similar with the integrated
Intel Cache chipset. I think there has been a lot experience used from
the -M- class DX-50 board. But this time everything fits on *one* printboard
and make the funny shielded hi-density connectors obsolete for the "second
floor" printboard.
>Are there any ECAs related to any specific FRUs?
No. The "classical" -K-type board went through several
"technical changes without notice" and that was all (S.O.D. - still
unclear which chip should fit in there ...).
So did the "92F0079-family" Type-2 boards. IBM never announced
any technical changes on these boards. As far as I can recall there was
no common ECA at anytime on any of the processorboard. Only "withdrawn
from marketing" notices ...
There had been some traffic on the IBM BBS in 1991 - 1993
when people found out that they could not use over 1GB harddisks with the
Type 1 & 2 platforms, but IBM offered the upgrade Eproms (for free
!) until the deadline of December 1992, which was then stretched out to
December 1993 at last.
Unsorted Oorts
When installed with the 486SX/25
Processor Upgrade Option, 16-bit bus masters (for example, PS/2 Micro Channel
SCSI Adapter (#1005, 6451109)) that support 32-bits of addressing will
cause system malfunction and/or potential loss of data when the user installs
greater than 16MB of system memory.
Can't See >16MB
Under W95
On an IBM PS/2 Model 77, 90 or 95 computer with more than
16 MB of memory (RAM) installed, Windows 95 only recognizes and uses 16
MB of memory. This is because HIMEM.SYS, the extended memory manager, only
detects 16 MB of memory installed.
CAUSE These computers
use a nonstandard API for reporting memory in excess of 16 MB that is not
supported by Windows 95.
RESOLUTION This issue is resolved
by the following updated file(s) for Windows 95 and OSR2, and later versions
of these file(s): HIMEM.SYS ver 3.95 dated 10/2/95 33,127
bytes
This and later versions of HIMEM.SYS
support the API used by the computers listed in this article for reporting
memory in excess of 16 MB.
STATUS Microsoft has
confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Windows 95. An update to address
this problem is now available, but is not fully regression tested and should
be applied only to computers experiencing this specific problem. Unless
you are severely impacted by this specific problem, Microsoft does notrecommend
implementing this update at this time. Contact Microsoft Technical Support
for additionalinformation about the availability of this update.
This issue is resolved in Microsoft Windows 98.
MORE INFORMATION The
computers listed in this article use INT 15 ax=c700h to report memory above
16 MB. (Other IBM PS/2 Microchannel computers may use INT 15 ax=E881.)
The updated version of Himem.sys accepts a /P switch that causes HIMEM
to use this API to detect memory in excess of 16 MB. Without the /P switch,
the updated HIMEM does not use this API, and functions the same as the
shipping version of HIMEM.
The new version of Himem.sys reports itself as version 3.95,
the same as the shipping version.
Knowledge Base Reference Article: Q137755: No More Than 16 MB of Memory
Reported on IBM PS/2 Model 77, 90
Sorry, I can't find it on M$. email ME for a copy of HIMEMUPD.EXE
9595
Main Page
|